|
Child
Credit
Don't
get confused: The child credit is in addition to
the child care credit and in addition to the tax
savings delivered when you claim an exemption for
a dependent child. As part of the big 2001 tax cut,
Congress made the child credit more valuable. For
2002, the credit is worth $600 for each child who
claim as a dependent who is under age 17 at the end
of the year. If
you have four children, the credit can cut your tax bill
by $2,400. Remember, a credit offsets your tax bill dollar
for dollar. The credit is scheduled to rise to $700
in 2005, $800 in 2009 and hit a nice, round $1,000 in
2010. . .as long as your kids don't hit age 17 by that
time.
The right to the child credit is phased out at higher
income levels and, despite a lot of talk, Congress did
not increase those levels. The phase-out begins when
adjusted gross income (AGI) passes $110,000 on a joint
return, $75,000 on a single return or $55,000 if you're
married filing separately. For every $1,000 (or fraction
of $1,000) your AGI exceeds the trigger point, you lose
$50 of credit. Say, for example, that you file a joint
return and your AGI is $105,000. The $5,000 over the
threshold would squeeze your credit by $250. If you have
just one dependent child in 2002, your credit would be
just $350. If you have three children who qualify, though,
your credits would be worth $1,550 ($1,800 - $250). The
phase-out moves in $50 steps, not $50-per-child steps.
Give Away
A Tax Bill
Another way children can help cut the family tax bill
is with gifts of appreciated securities. If you give
a child stocks or mutual fund shares that have appreciated,
for example, the tax bill on the increase in value is
passed on to the recipient along with the gift. Assume
that stock you bought for $2,500 is now worth $5,000
and that you have a tuition bill coming due. If you sold
the stock, you'd owe tax on the $2,500 gain. The 20%
rate on long-term capital gains means that would cost
you $500. Not bad, perhaps, but there's a way to cut
the bill in half. . .or maybe even drive it lower.
How? By giving the shares to your college student. When
sold, the same $2,500 would be taxed, but at the child's
rate (assuming he or she isn't a prodigy who has started
college before age 14). If he or she falls in the 15%
bracket, the 10% long-term capital gains rate would apply
and the tax bill would be $250. Don't think your child
has to hold on to the stock for more than 12 months to
get special capital gains treatment, either. When gifts
of appreciated asset are involved, the recipients holding
period includes time that the donor owned the property.
This strategy can pay off even more handsomely if you
have owned the appreciated stock for more than five years.
If you give it to a child in the 10% or 15% tax bracket,
the gain would qualify for the new 5-year-gain treatment.
. .and a tax rate of just 8%.
What if you didn't really want to part with the stock?
You could always reinvest in the shares with the cash
that otherwise would have gone for tuition. You'd be
taxed only on appreciation from that time on. (Take care
not to let this strategy cost you a dependency exemption,
which it could if, with the gift money, the child winds
up supplying more than 50% of his or her support.)
All this attention to generosity demands a brief mention
here about the federal gift tax. The law permits you
to give up to $11,000 each year to any number of people
without having to worry about the gift tax. If you're
married, you and your spouse can give up to $22,000 each
year to each person on your gift list. Gifts above those
levels are subject to the gift tax. When it comes into
play, this tax is imposed on the giver of gifts, not
the recipient. And, since there's a credit to offset
the tax on the first $1 million of taxable gifts in 2002
and later years, it's doubtful you'll ever have to pay
a dime in gift taxes.
Children,
College, and the "Kiddie Tax"
Despite various crackdowns, income splitting can still
save your family money. If you're planning to help pay
for your children's college education, starting to give
them the money for tuition long before the first bill
comes due can still get Uncle Sam to help pay the bill.
Remember that the first $1,500 of unearned income escapes
the kiddie tax in 2002 and 2003. A child could have $25,000
in an account yielding 6% without having to worry about
the kiddie tax. If that $1,500 is the child's only income
in 2002 or 2003, the tax bill will be just $75 (the first
$750 is tax free, the next $750 taxed in the new, 10%
bracket). If the same $1,500 were taxed in the parents'
35% bracket, for example, the tax would be $525. The
$450 savings is the IRS contribution to the college fund.
Since the kiddie tax disappears when a child reaches
age 14, consider giving your kids investments that defer
income until that time.
U.S. savings bonds are a natural choice because income
can be deferred until the bond is cashed. If that's after
the child reaches 14, even the interest that accrued
during his or her younger days is taxed at the child's
own rate. However, a recently added tax-saving twist
for savings bonds could make it a better deal to buy
the bonds in the parent's name rather than making the
child the owner. When parents own the bonds and cash
them in to pay a child's college tuition and fees, the
interest on the bonds can be totally tax-free.
Growth stocks, which generally throw off little if any
current income in the form of dividends, are another
way around the kiddie tax. As the stock appreciates,
there is no tax on that paper profit. If the stock is
sold after the child is 14, the profit is taxed in the
child's bracket. Note that if a child invests in growth-stock
mutual funds, rather than individual stocks, the fund
will pay out capital-gains distributions each year based
on trading within the fund. Such income would be subject
to the kiddie tax if the child's unearned income exceeds
$1,500 in 2002 or 2003.
For income splitting to work, the child must actually
own the assets that generate the income. If you want
your son to pay taxes in his bracket on $1,000 of interest
income generated by a $15,000 savings account, you can't
simply give him the $1,000. You've got to give him the
$15,000 in the account. Only then will the income it
produces be his for tax purposes.
The easiest way to make
such a gift to a minor child is to set up a custodial
account under your state's Uniform Gift to Minors Act
(UGMA) or Uniform Transfer to Minors Act (UTMA). Banks,
savings
& loans, credit unions, mutual funds and brokerage
firms offer such accounts. All you need is a Social
Security number for the child and a custodian to manage
the account until the minor comes of age. You can name
yourself custodian, but if you are also the donor and
you die before the child reaches maturity, the gift
will be considered part of your estate for federal estate-tax
purposes.
An important point about custodial accounts is that
your gift is irrevocable-you can't get it back. Once
the child reaches the age set by your state's UGMA or
UTMA law-typically 18 or 21-adult supervision of the
account ends and the child can do anything he or she
wants with the money. If sandy beaches are more enticing
than ivy-covered walls, well.
You don't need a custodial account if you invest the
child's money in U.S. savings bonds. Just buy the bonds
in the child's name. Don't name yourself co-owner, though,
or the income will still be taxed to you when the bonds
are cashed.
Buying
Property for Your Kids to Live in During College
Here's another income splitting/real estate combination
that some parents have found a valuable help in paying
for a child's college education. They pull together the
down payment for a house or condo in the college town.
The child gets a roommate or two and they all pay rent
to the parents, who report it as income but also get
to deduct mortgage interest, property taxes and depreciation.
The parents also hire their child to manage the apartment-finding
tenants, collecting rents, taking care of maintenance
and repairs. What they pay him or her is deductible from
the rental income. If the rental property shows a loss,
and if the parents qualify for the $25,000 exception
to the passive-loss rules, that loss can shelter other
income. Any profit when the home is sold after graduation
is an added sweetener.
Hiring
The Family
If you have your own business-either full- or part-time-you
have another income-splitting opportunity. Put your children
on the payroll, working in the evenings and on weekends
during the school year and during the summer. What you
pay them is a business deduction for you and earned income
for them. That shifts income out of your tax bracket
and into the child's. Because it's earned income, the
kiddie tax doesn't come into play.
Loans
to Family Members
With today's house prices, this is an increasingly probable
scene: Your son and his wife come over for dinner, fill
the air with friendly chitchat and finally mumble sheepishly
what's really on their mind: They've found their dream
house and need help with the down payment.
No, they're not so brash as to ask for a $20,000 gift.
Just a loan. A loan with very lenient terms-like no interest
and an extremely flexible repayment schedule.
As you discuss the request,
be aware that Uncle Sam may want to horn in on this
congenial family scene. The government's interest in
intrafamily loans stems from having been burned by
no-interest loans designed to dodge taxes. Wealthy
parents could "lend'' money to a
child in a low tax bracket and, in the best of income-splitting
traditions, the child would invest the money so the income
would be taxed at the child's lower rates. That loophole
has been closed.
The law now treats such loans as though the lender is
charging interest on the deal and simultaneously making
a gift to the borrower of the amount needed to pay that
interest. This fiction has a very real tax consequence:
The lender has to report as taxable income the phantom
interest the loan did not produce. What's more, if the
amount of foregone interest exceeds $10,000, the lender
may be liable for federal gift taxes.
Don't turn down your kids' request straightaway, though,
because-as usual-there are exceptions that can protect
your intrafamily loan from the IRS.
If the amount of the loan outstanding at any time is
$10,000 or less, the IRS will ignore it. Under that test,
husband and wife are considered to be one lender and
the $10,000 limit applies.
A second exception protects even bigger low-interest
or even interest-free loans. For loans up to $100,000,
the IRS won't get involved as long as the borrower's
investment income is less than $1,000. If it goes over
$1,000, the forgone interest to be reported by you and
deducted by the borrower is limited to the amount of
the borrower's investment income.
In other words, you can go ahead and lend your children
$20,000 interest-free for their down payment, but they'd
better use most of their own savings, too. If their investment
income for the year surpasses the $1,000 threshold, your
friendly arrangement could be stung by the imputed-interest
rules.
Both the $10,000 and the $100,000 exceptions are voided
if the purpose of the loan is to save taxes. If the borrowed
funds are used to acquire income-producing assets, for
example, the loan automatically falls victim to the imputed-interest
rules. That doesn't block loans for such purposes as
a house down payment, college tuition or to help a child
start a business.
If you make a loan that
fails to meet one of the exceptions, the amount of
imputed interest on the deal is based on IRS-set rates
that reflect what it costs the government to borrow
money. These
"applicable federal rates'' are adjusted periodically.
In the Fall of 2002, the long-term AFR was about 5.5%.
Call your local IRS office to learn the current AFR or
check it out at the IRS website: www.irs.gov.. If you
charge a low interest rate, rather than no interest,
the imputed interest is the difference between what you
actually charge and the amount due using the prevailing
applicable federal rate.
Death
in the Family
When a taxpayer dies, a new taxpaying entity-the taxpayer's
estate-is born to make sure no taxable income falls through
the cracks. Income is taxed either on the taxpayer's
final return, on the return of the beneficiary who acquires
the right to receive the income, or, if the estate receives
$600 or more of income, on the estate's income tax return.
The chore of filing the
taxpayer's final return usually falls to the executor
or administrator of the estate, but if neither is named,
a survivor must do it. The return is filed on the same
form that would have been used if the taxpayer were
still alive, but "deceased'' is
written after the taxpayer's name and the date of death
entered on the name-and-address space. The filing deadline:
April 15 of the year following the taxpayer's death.
Only income earned between the beginning of the year
and the date of death should be reported on the final
return. For taxpayers who use the cash method of accounting,
as most do, income is considered earned as it is actually
received or at least made available to them. Taxpayers
who use the accrual method of accounting, on the other
hand, count income as earned when they actually earn
it, regardless of when it is received.
The distinction is important
because some income that might logically seem to belong
on the decedent's final return is considered "income
in respect of a decedent'' and is taxable either to
the estate or to the person who receives it. Consider
these examples.
- Joe Jones owned and operated an
orchard. He used the cash method of accounting. He
sold $2,000 worth of fruit to a customer but did
not receive payment before his death. That amount
is not reported on Joe's final return. When the estate
was settled, payment had still not been made and
the right to receive it went to Joe's niece. When
she collects the money, she will report it as taxable
income.
If Joe had used the accrual method of accounting,
the $2,000 would have been considered earned on
the date of the sale and therefore included on
his final return. His niece would not have to include
the money on her return when the payment was actually
received.
-
Mary Smith was entitled to a large
salary payment at the date of her death, to be paid
in five annual installments. Her estate collected two
payments and then gave the right to the remaining three
payments to her grandson. None of the income would
be included on Mary's final return. The estate would
include in its taxable income the two payments it received.
Her grandson would include the other three payments
in his taxable income-as income in respect of a decedent-on
the returns for the years he received the money.
Income in respect of a decedent encompasses only income
that the decedent had a right to receive at the time
of death but that is not reported on the final return.
It does not include earnings on savings or investments
that accrue after death.
Say a taxpayer who has a substantial amount in money-market
mutual funds dies June 30. Only interest earned up to
that date would be reported on the final tax return.
Earnings after that date are taxable to the beneficiary
of the account or the estate. That can create some hassles
since the payer-a mutual fund, bank or broker, for example-will
report income to the IRS on a 1099 form.
Although you should try to get ownership of the account
changed as quickly as possible after the death of the
owner, the 1099 income report may well show more income
assigned to the decedent than it should. In such cases,
you must report the entire amount on Schedule B of the
decedent's return and then deduct the amount that is
being reported by the estate or other beneficiary who
actually received the income.
Remember that money you inherit is generally not subject
to the federal income tax. If you inherit a $100,000
certificate of deposit, for example, the $100,000 is
not taxable. Only interest on it from the time you become
the owner is taxed. If you receive interest that accrued
but was not paid prior to the owner's death, it is considered
income in respect of a decedent and is taxable on your
return.
A major exception to the general rule that inheritances
are not subject to the income tax-and one that is taking
on more and more importance-is that money in regular
IRAs, company retirement plans including 401(k)s and
403(b)s, and annuities is treated as income in respect
of a decedent and therefore taxed to the heir who
receives it.
There's a special rule for U.S. savings bonds, income
on which generally accrues tax-free until the bonds are
cashed. When the bond owner dies, the accrued interest
may be treated as income in respect of a decedent. In
that case, the new owner of the bonds becomes responsible
for the tax on the interest accrued during the life of
the decedent. (The tax isn't due, however, until the
new owner cashes the bonds.)
Alternatively, the interest accrued up to the date of
death can be reported on his or her final tax return.
That could be a tax-saving choice if the decedent will
be in a lower tax bracket than the beneficiary. If that
method is chosen, the person who gets the bonds includes
in his or her income only interest earned after the date
of death.
On the deduction side of the ledger, all deductible
expenses paid before death can be written off on the
final return. In addition, medical bills paid within
one year after death may be treated as having been paid
by the decedent at the time the expenses were incurred.
That means the cost of a final illness can be deducted
on the final return even if the bills were not paid until
after death.
If deductions are not itemized on the final return,
the full standard deduction may be claimed, regardless
of when during the year the taxpayer died. Even if the
death occurred on January 1, the full standard deduction
is available. The same goes for the taxpayer's personal
exemption.
If the taxpayer was married, the widow or widower may
file a joint return for the year of death, claiming both
personal exemptions and the full standard deduction and
using the lower joint-return rates. A joint return is
usually filed by the executor, but the surviving spouse
can file the return if no executor or administrator has
been appointed.
If an executor or administrator
is involved, he or she must sign the return for the
decedent. When a joint return is filed, the spouse
must also sign. When there is no executor or administrator,
whoever is responsible for filing the return should
sign the return and note that he or she is signing
on behalf of the decedent. If a joint return is filed
by the surviving spouse alone, he or she should sign
the return, and write "filing
as surviving spouse'' in the space for the other spouse's
signature.
If a refund is due, there's one more step. You must
also complete and file with the final return a copy of
Form 1310, Statement of Person Claiming Refund Due a
Deceased Taxpayer. Although the IRS says you don't have
to file Form 1310 if you are a surviving spouse filing
a joint return, you probably should file the form anyway
to head off possible delays.
If the person filing the final return is the decedent's
court-appointed representative, he or she must attach
a copy of the form certifying the appointment. When a
return calling for a refund is filed by anyone other
than a court-appointed representative or a surviving
spouse filing a joint return, Form 1310 must also be
accompanied by a copy of the taxpayer's death certificate
or other proof of death.
Back to
Top |